Supporters of the Intoxilyzer will say the machine will only absorb alcohol and nothing else. Having said that, opponents of the Intoxilyzer say that the it frequently misreads other sorts of frequently found elements in human breath and incorrectly shows high readings saying that they are from alcohol.
Of particular importance here are the following points. First, the Drunk driving alcohol concentration law states a person is drunk when he has a.08 in his breath, although it does not say.08 by breathalyzer. This fact implies that no judge or jury is either expected or obligated to believe that an Intoxilyzer result of.08 or more is accurate or dependable.
Second, the manufacturer will not permit anybody outside of law enforcement to test the machine’s accuracy or dependability. It is commonly believed that for a method to be established as legitimate and reliable in science, it must be offered to the scientific community for assessment. This is not the scenario with theIntoxilyzer.
Third, the producer says it won’t warrant the Intoxilyzer to be fit for any particular purpose, an implied admission by the manufacturer that its machine is not actually guaranteed as precise and reliable for breath testing.
Fourth and last, the Intoxilyzer’s operating design is built upon the presumption that every person tested is exactly the average individual. All people are not exactly average! Human beings come in various sizes, weights, ages, and vary in muscle size, lung capacity, alcohol tolerance, temperature, hematocrit level (volume of solids in the blood) as well as blood/breath proportion (the amount of times an item shows up in the blood vs. the number of times the same item is found in the breath). Automatic and unknown mistakes can be illustrated by just having the person tested not be exactly average. In connection with this, it should be mentioned that Intoxilyzer assumes a blood/breath proportion of 2100/1 (2100 parts of alcohol in the blood for every 1 part of alcohol in the breath) for every individual tested. Here, it should be noted that a vast majority of persons have a blood/breath ratio of 2100/1 or higher. Persons with a blood/breath proportion higher than 2100/1 will not be prejudiced by Intoxilyzer’s assumption. However, persons with a decreased blood/breath ratio will be prejudiced because the Intoxilyzer will erroneously report too high an alcohol concentration result and can bring about somebody who ought to test a.04,.05,.06, etc. to actually check out at.08,.11,.12, etc. Of unique relevance here is the fact that scientists have recorded persons with blood/breath ratios as minimal as 1100/1.
Additionally, given that the Intoxilyzer is designed, serviced, and handled by humans, it is subject to human errors just like any other machines.
The above facts conclusively illustrate that the Intoxilyzer, even if it is properly working and is being carefully operated, because the person being tested is not exactly average, can label an innocent individual as guilty.
Understanding your rights after a DUI arrest is important. Speaking with a Collin County Lawyer is a great first step at finding out what your options are. A qualified NJ Criminal Defense Attorney can help clarify your legal issues and choices.